In a unanimous decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a decision of the lower court which dismissed the claim of a former police officer who sued his employer, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, for $20 million for alleged job-related injuries. The plaintiff sued under the Federal Employers' Liability Act ("FELA") alleging he sustained injuries resulting from exposure to the World Trade Center site following 9/11. He also complained of MTA' s policy of requiring that officers remain at home while on disability leave unless granted a special designation known as "no work status." The 2nd Circuit agreed with HNRK's arguments that plaintiff failed to comply with pleading requirements for a valid FELA claim and that he released his claims anyway as part of a settlement of an earlier suit. The Circuit concluded that the appeal was frivolous and is considering an application to award damages to the MTA. Bruno v. MTA, 2009 WL 2524009 (2nd Cir. 2009).